Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!PAVEPAWS.BERKELEY.EDU!dillon
From: dillon@PAVEPAWS.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <8605221840.AA04752@pavepaws>
Date: Thu, 22-May-86 14:40:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: pavepaws.8605221840.AA04752
Posted: Thu May 22 14:40:14 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 24-May-86 21:34:29 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 11


	The 8088 is cheep.  It only has an 8 bit bus so the support 
hardware is cheep.  There are far more programs for the IBM-PC (/XT) then
there are for the AT (and the XT uses an 8088).  I would go with an 8088
for those reasons also. 

	But then again, since I have a choice, I think I'll stick with
a 68xxx.  My real question is, why didn't Amiga go with a 68020?

						-Matt