Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!vecpyr!amd!pesnta!hplabs!hp-pcd!orstcs!nathan From: nathan@orstcs.UUCP (nathan) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Apple's response to 10 Challenges Message-ID: <21100044@orstcs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 16-May-86 04:14:00 EDT Article-I.D.: orstcs.21100044 Posted: Fri May 16 04:14:00 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 23-May-86 21:40:24 EDT Organization: Oregon State University - Corvallis, OR Lines: 43 Nf-ID: #N:orstcs:21100044:000:1541 Nf-From: orstcs!nathan May 16 00:14:00 1986 In response to my Ten Challenges posting, I got a letter from our respected contact at Apple: > From: Larry Rosenstein He had this to say: > ...I liked your suggestions. Here are my comments on them. I have paraphrased his comments *just a bit* : >#1: (search string construction kit, w/ context-free grammar ability) > yes, but we at Apple prefer a less innovative approach. >#2: (graphical pipeline approach to data manipulation) > yes, but we at Apple prefer the MSDOS command-line approach to pipelines. >#3: (smart ramdisk) > yes, that would be ok; but we at Apple have hard disks, so who needs it? >#4: (two-button mouse) > no, we *like* not having enough buttons so you have to use both hands. >#5: (Copy file DA) > yes, but we at Apple are happy with our command-line solution. >#6: (GEM-style menu bar) > no, we prefer the Apple way (but it should be easy to do). >#7: (modular resource editor) > yes, Apple did this years ago, documents will be ready Real Soon Now ... >#8: (device ports in the file system, controlled by virtual resources) > yes, but some things would be slow if you did them the slow way. >#9: (document description standard) > yes, Apple will be happy to use anything you can get ANSI to stamp. >#10: (add'l challenges) > yes, we at Apple are always in need of a good belly laugh. I'm sure Larry won't mind my taking liberties with his text. (grin) Nathan C. Myers orstcs!nathan nathan@oregon-state p.s. you do know a roast when you see one, don't you?