Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!pesnta!hplabs!hp-sdd!ncr-sd!sdcsvax!sdcc6!sdcc7!ln63soi
From: ln63soi@sdcc7.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.micro.mac,net.micro.pc,net.micro.att
Subject: Re: SCSI pronunciation query
Message-ID: <390@sdcc7.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 24-May-86 02:36:56 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcc7.390
Posted: Sat May 24 02:36:56 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 26-May-86 01:14:05 EDT
References: <703@mtung.UUCP> <646@unirot.UUCP>
Reply-To: ln63soi@sdcc7.UUCP (Paul van de Graaf)
Distribution: net
Organization: U.C. San Diego, Academic Computer Center
Lines: 13
Xref: watmath net.micro:14709 net.micro.mac:6287 net.micro.pc:8395 net.micro.att:1221

In article <646@unirot.UUCP> gjb@unirot.UUCP (Greg Brail) writes:
>..., and if it ever does
>manage to become a standard, it can't possibly be that scuzzy. :-)
>

"System V:  from now on, consider it standard." (gag!)

Of course there're plenty of other "standards" that can be considered as
scuzzy.  MS-DOS is one that comes to mind...  I very much prefer SCUZZY as
the pronuciation;  it implies the low-level scuzzy details that are part of
the interfacing process.

Paul van de Graaf	sdcsvax!sdcc7!ln63soi		U. C. San Diego