Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!sdcsvax!sdcc6!calmasd!jnp
From: jnp@calmasd.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.misc,net.rumor
Subject: Re: The Presidents   how I feel they rate in history
Message-ID: <1888@calmasd.CALMA.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 15-May-86 16:00:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: calmasd.1888
Posted: Thu May 15 16:00:59 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 18-May-86 15:21:00 EDT
References: <133@petrus.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: G.E. CALMA R&D, San Diego, CA
Lines: 30
Xref: linus net.politics:15277 net.misc:8256 net.rumor:2063
Summary: my re-classifications

In article <133@petrus.UUCP>, jfs@petrus.UUCP (Jack Stanley) writes:
> I will rate each president with a 1 to 10.      And I thing it would be 
> great ( That should be I THINK) to have opposing views on my thoughts.

George Washington    10		I say 5, maybe 6.  He wasn't a particularly
				great president, mostly famous for being 1st.

Abraham Lincoln      10		6 at most, he delayed the construction of the
				trans-continental railroads, and was in favor
				of war with the south - rather than re-concil-
				liation.

U.S. Grant           1		Right on target - a drunken illiterate.

Grover Cleavland     5		8 - he was instrumental in what is now the
				national park system.

Woodrow Wilson       7		4 - spent too much time on his league of 
				nations not enough on domestic issues.

F D Roosevelt        9		2 - please!

James E Carter       5		2 - ditto



-- 
These opinions are solely mine and in no way reflect those of my employer.  

...{ucbvax|decvax}!sdcsvax!calmasd!jnp   jnp@calmasd.UUCP GE/Calma San Diego