Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!hplabs!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: net.sci
Subject: Re: Biorhythms
Message-ID: <1125@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Apr-86 12:05:17 EST
Article-I.D.: psivax.1125
Posted: Tue Apr 22 12:05:17 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 24-Apr-86 05:49:22 EST
References: <935@cylixd.UUCP> <155@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 19

In article <155@brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl.ARPA writes:
>
>two cycles (28 days feminine, 23 days (I think) masculine)
>that he claimed were active in everybody.
>The 28-day cycle for women (only) has a clear foundation, but
>the more general claims do seem to be in the same category as
>astrology.

	And please note, even the 28-day cycle is an *average* not an
exact constant. There is considerable variation not only between
individuals, but even over time in a single individual. This alone is
enough to make Biorythms useless, they would only apply to those few
people whose cycles happen to exactly match the average!!
-- 

				Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen
ARPA: ttidca!psivax!friesen@rand-unix.arpa