Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!cit-vax!speck From: speck@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu (Don Speck) Newsgroups: net.unix Subject: Re: Are these the disks for me? Message-ID: <466@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> Date: Mon, 12-May-86 01:28:42 EDT Article-I.D.: cit-vax.466 Posted: Mon May 12 01:28:42 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 14-May-86 06:50:02 EDT References: <299@brl-smoke.ARPA> Organization: California Institute of Technology Lines: 40 Summary: ALL new products have bugs In article <299@brl-smoke.ARPA>, lacasse@rand-unix.arpa writes: > I would be careful on the the Spectralogic, as I don't think they have sold > many controllers and you will likely find Unix software support lower > because of this. > Emulex is the clear leader. You might consider their SC-7003. Its a new > product, 8 drives, 3.0 MB/S SMD. We have one on order ourselves. Emulex has as little Unix support as you can get: last I heard, they have no in-house Unix machines, only VMS. So they have no way of detecting those bugs that show up on Unix and not VMS. A year ago we bought a Fujitsu M2298K and Emulex SC7000. There's an option to map the drive as two DEC RM05's (wasting space), or unmapped. VMS has to use the former, but we wanted the latter; since we were probably the first non-VMS site to buy a 2298 from them, guess what - the unmapped mode didn't work. A couple days, new prom revision. At the same time we bought a tape drive and TC13 controller. I started loading the 4.2bsd distribution tape and find that standalone copy could read the tape, but the generic kernel couldn't. Much debugging later, I find that the TC13 is upset because the status buffer just happened to cross a 256-byte boundary - someone forgot to carry into the high byte of the address. Within the week, new prom revision (Rev. D). For a long time I observed that the clock on that machine lost many minutes whenever we did dumps. I figured my non-standard 'dump' was overloading the raw I/O system, which I knew spent lots of time at spl6(), but recently I figured out that it was the tape controller's fault. Another set of new proms (Rev. F). (Emulex was extremely cooperative once they knew that there was a problem, and in other respects their stuff has been great). My point is that the latest, greatest board is unlikely to have been debugged on a Unix VAX yet (they aren't as common as VMS). You are asking to be a guinea pig. It may be worth it - it was for us - but you'd better be aware that you're getting into that. Don Speck speck@vlsi.caltech.edu seismo!cit-vax!speck