Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!ORNL-MSR.ARPA!jcm
From: jcm@ORNL-MSR.ARPA (James A. Mullens)
Newsgroups: mod.computers.68k
Subject: Pipeline to DRI?
Message-ID: <8605281350.AA04800@ORNL-MSR.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 28-May-86 09:50:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: ORNL-MSR.8605281350.AA04800
Posted: Wed May 28 09:50:38 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 29-May-86 03:10:11 EDT
Sender: mwm@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 15
Approved: info-68k@ucbvax.berkeley.edu


DRI has an area on CompuServe which they monitor.  They respond to requests
from people who have registered the product -- you must send a special 
message to the sysop (I think) to get access to the technical questions
section of the DRI bulletin board.

Should this group attempt to communicate with DRI and other 68K users through
that medium?  Would Compuserve object if we regularly posted DRIs Compuserve
emissions on this net?

On a slightly different topic, has anyone decided whether the Atari/68K/GEM
stuff is close enough to vanilla cp/m-68k to share compilers, etc?

jim mullens
oak ridge national lab