Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!BLUE.RUTGERS.EDU!PATTERSON
From: PATTERSON@BLUE.RUTGERS.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Port Collisions
Message-ID: <12206659223.23.PATTERSON@BLUE.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Wed, 14-May-86 13:01:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: BLUE.12206659223.23.PATTERSON
Posted: Wed May 14 13:01:46 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 16-May-86 01:41:53 EDT
References: <860514110721.9.DCP@FIREBIRD.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 9
Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa

Yes, but then you have collision problems with protocol names. Most people
would use acronyms, not word-by-word forms. You still need a Socket Czar,
only now sockets have a (reasonably) human-understandable format (i.e TELNET
instead of 23.)
 
Ross Patterson
Center for Computer and Information Services
Rutgers University
-------