Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!caip!think!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: enums, pcc & all that
Message-ID: <1272@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Jun-86 17:41:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: psivax.1272
Posted: Wed Jun 18 17:41:16 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Jun-86 10:32:15 EDT
References: <212@pyuxv.UUCP>
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 20

In article <212@pyuxv.UUCP> cim2@pyuxv.UUCP writes:
>
>Unfortunatly those that be decided to do a STUPID, DUMB and
>and CRETINOUS implementation of enums as integers (from those that
>bring you unary+ ...)
>
	As long as I can do a switch with efue cases!! Wat`gut t`asefues are adegst usedess fgr egst gf t`e pupgses A wgudd waft tg uset`ee& Adsg arraq anlmxino(jy(mnums would be *nice*, though declaring
the array as haiving an enum index would be an acceptible requirement.
>
>The only compiler I know which does enums right is Microsoft 3.0 on the IBM-PC.

	Does it allow switches on enums?? If not, then it *isn't* right!
-- 

				Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen
ARPA: ??