Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site peora.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hjuxa!petsd!peora!jer
From: jer@peora.UUCP (J. Eric Roskos)
Newsgroups: net.unix,net.unix-wizards,net.arch,net.lang.c
Subject: Re: get size of malloc'd object
Message-ID: <2219@peora.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 25-Jun-86 15:44:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: peora.2219
Posted: Wed Jun 25 15:44:05 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jun-86 06:52:50 EDT
References: <165@daisy.UUCP> <334@valid.UUCP> <2206@peora.UUCP> <2081@umcp-cs.UUCP> <1043@umd5.UUCP>
Organization: Concurrent Computer Corporation, Orlando, Fl
Lines: 10
Xref: watmath net.unix:8393 net.unix-wizards:18602 net.arch:3575 net.lang.c:9578

> Yes, but I think there is a question whether you want to tell the user
> about 1. how much he ASKED for, or 2. how much happens to BE there...

The only portable value is how much he asked for.  If he got more than
that, it is just an artifact of the memory allocation scheme, which would
be implementation-dependent, and thus he shouldn't use it; allowing him to
know how much extra he really got is a step in the direction of promoting
him to use it, which would seem not to be a good idea.
-- 
E. Roskos