Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: LPow correction
Message-ID: <1848@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 30-Jun-86 20:49:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.1848
Posted: Mon Jun 30 20:49:47 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 1-Jul-86 06:23:02 EDT
References: <1843@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Followup-To: net.math
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 9

In article <1843@brl-smoke.ARPA> Root Boy Jim <rbj@icst-cmr> writes:
> He could have chosen x^(sin x) as well, but why should he?

Of course that has the same limit as x->0+.

I bet people are getting tired of this discussion.  Any further
debate about whether 0^0 has a definite value, can harmlessly be
assigned one, etc. should move to net.math instead, so we can
bore the mathematicians too.