Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!okstate.UUCP!uokvax.UUCP!emjej From: emjej@uokvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.micro.6809 Subject: Re: CoCo III - Still a Rumor? Message-ID: <3500152@uokvax.UUCP> Date: Tue, 3-Jun-86 14:02:00 EDT Article-I.D.: uokvax.3500152 Posted: Tue Jun 3 14:02:00 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 7-Jun-86 05:18:52 EDT References: <115@safari.UUCP> Lines: 27 Nf-ID: #R:safari.UUCP:115:uokvax.UUCP:3500152:000:1507 Nf-From: uokvax.UUCP!emjej Jun 3 13:02:00 1986 /* Written 1:48 am May 30, 1986 by ecs160s002@ucdavis.UUCP in uokvax.UUCP:net.micro.6809 */ > Has anyone heard anything more about the still rumored CoCo III? Out here > in the sticks of Oregon, we haven't heard much except that some Radio Shacks > got price and/or availability lists. What's the scoop with this rumored OS-9 > Level II machine? > > Stan Dolson > ..!tektronix!omssw2!argent!safari!stan > ..!tektronix!reed!omen!bucket!stand > ..!tektronix!reed!omen!bucket!percival!stanleyd The "CoCo III" is a farce. As far as I know, Tandy is quietly dropping the CoCo into the abyss and doesn't care much what we think about it. They have said in their newsletter that they will not be releasing a 68k machine, so even if they do release a new machine it will still have the same limits as the CoCo does, even with n 6829's. The PC is still 16 bits wide and no change in "addressable" memory will change the fact that we can not run any sizable program. I do not WANT to worry about splitting up a large program just right so that the modules will fit correctly into memory. The operating system should do this or the memory should be large enough. Either way, the CoCo is pretty obsolete (no flames please, I am just being honest. I like the thing, but I recognize its limitations). - Mark Nagel ...!{ucbvax,dual,lll-crg}!ucdavis!deneb!u572112244ea /* End of text from uokvax.UUCP:net.micro.6809 */