Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watnot.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!djfiander
From: djfiander@watnot.UUCP (David J. Fiander)
Newsgroups: net.micro.6809
Subject: Re: CoCo III - Still a Rumor?
Message-ID: <11800@watnot.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Jun-86 14:50:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: watnot.11800
Posted: Fri Jun  6 14:50:05 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Jun-86 06:38:04 EDT
References: <115@safari.UUCP> <3500153@uokvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: djfiander@watnot.UUCP (David J. Fiander)
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 19
Summary: 

>
>>They have
>>said in their newsletter that they will not be releasing a 68k machine, so
>>even if they do release a new machine it will still have the same limits
>>as the CoCo does, even with n 6829's.
>
>They already have a 68K-based computer; it may not have reasonable graphics,
>and they don't sell a decent OS for it, but it exists.  (I agree, though,
>that a 68K-based machine with good graphics and OS-9 would be ideal.) 

I find it interesting that a USENET user thinks that UN*X SYS V (which is
the OS on tandy's 68K machine) isn't a decent OS <:->. Oh, well.  Maybe 
you would prefer that it ran CP-M68K :-?

-- 
    UUCP  : {allegra,ihnp4,decvax,utzoo,clyde}!watmath!watnot!djfiander
    CSNET : djfiander%watnot@waterloo.CSNET
    ARPA  : djfiander%watnot%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.ARPA
    BITNET: djfiande@watdcs