Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!pyramid!amiga!neil
From: neil@amiga.UUCP (Neil Katin)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: Q on AbortIO()
Message-ID: <1236@amiga.amiga.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 30-May-86 11:32:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: amiga.1236
Posted: Fri May 30 11:32:19 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 1-Jun-86 06:56:23 EDT
References: <8605232153.AA01439@pavepaws> <297@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <1174@well.UUCP>
Reply-To: neil@rocky.UUCP (Neil Katin)
Organization: Commodore-Amiga Inc., 983 University Ave #D, Los Gatos CA 95030
Lines: 20
Keywords: WaitIO(), oops

In article <1174@well.UUCP> ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) writes:
>In article <297@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> randy@cbmvax.UUCP (Randy Weiner) writes:
>>	In this case, since the request has already completed, the 
>>AbortIO fails and the flag field is 0. You should receive your reply
>>in the expected fashion, meaning WaitIO should catch the almost
>>aborted but completed request. You must still remove the reply
>>(GetMsg(xxx)) yourself as WaitIO never removes a reply.
>			   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> [ ... ]
>
>	WHAT??!!  Are you *ABSOLUTELY* sure about this one?  I distinctly
>remember reading in the RKM that WaitIO() does use the reply port:
>

Yes, you are correct.  WaitIO DOES remove the request.  Sorry about the
mistake.

	Neil Katin
	Commodore-Amiga Inc.
	amiga!neil