Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ucbcad!pavepaws!chapman
From: chapman@pavepaws.berkeley.edu (Brent Chapman)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: KickStart disks vs. ROM kernel
Message-ID: <605@ucbcad.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Thu, 12-Jun-86 19:52:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbcad.605
Posted: Thu Jun 12 19:52:53 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 17-Jun-86 06:06:07 EDT
References: <18@uw-atm.UUCP> <1261@amiga.amiga.UUCP> <604@ucbcad.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: news@ucbcad.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: chapman@pavepaws.UUCP (Brent Chapman)
Organization: UNIXversity of California, Berkeley
Lines: 27
Keywords: KickStart ROM

In article <604@ucbcad.BERKELEY.EDU> chapman@pavepaws.UUCP (Brent Chapman) writes:
>>In article <18@uw-atm.UUCP> james@uw-atm.UUCP (James M Synge) writes:
>>  There has been some debate about whether the kernel should remain on the
>>current KickStart disk, or be placed in ROM (as the name ROM Kernel implies).
>>
>
>How about having KickStart in ROM standard, but with an (hopefully not
>TOO expensive) option for us hacker types to replace that ROM with RAM
>and use a KickStart disk? 
>
>Brent
>

Oops!  OK, next time I'll read all 279 backlogged articles before I
start posting followups, to keep from suggesting something that's
already been mentioned.  Sorry about that.

Brent


--

Brent Chapman
chapman@pavepaws.berkeley.edu
ucbvax!pavepaws!chapman

TANSTAAFL!  (There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch!)