Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!caip!seismo!rochester!ur-tut!dpvc
From: dpvc@ur-tut.UUCP (David Cervone)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: Mutual-Exclude Gadgets
Message-ID: <429@ur-tut.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Jun-86 13:53:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: ur-tut.429
Posted: Wed Jun 18 13:53:42 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Jun-86 07:11:31 EDT
References: <1286@well.UUCP>
Reply-To: dpvc@ur-tut.UUCP (David Cervone)
Organization: Univ. of Rochester Computing Center
Lines: 25

In article <1286@well.UUCP> kdd@well.UUCP (Keith David Doyle) writes:
>
>   The problems I have been having with Mutual Exclude gadgets, seem
>to stem from an effect that occurs when doing a RefreshGadgets() multiple
>times when a gadget is selected.  I've found that a gadget actually seems
>to want to go through 4 states each time it is refreshed when the selected
>bit is on in the gadget structure.  ... [more description]
>
>Keith Doyle

I have encountered the same problem.  I have written an implementation of
mutual-exclude gadgets (in C) that makes this work somewhat better.  GADGHCOMP
and GADGHBOX still can get messed up in window gadgets, but work pretty good
with requester gadgets.  Image gadgets work just fine (as always).  I am 
working on the documentation, and plan to post it as soon as it is done, but 
if people really need it right away, I can mail it to people now and send out 
the documentation when it is done.  If nobody wants it at all, I won't have 
to write any more documentation.  Any takers?

Please send e-mail, as I am behind in my reading.

Davide P. Cervone
University of Rochester
UUCP:  ur-tut!dpvc
BITNET: DPVC@UORDBV