Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!caip!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!jade!ucbopal!mwm From: mwm@ucbopal.berkeley.edu (Mike Meyer) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: A wierd thought... Message-ID: <864@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Wed, 18-Jun-86 17:20:46 EDT Article-I.D.: jade.864 Posted: Wed Jun 18 17:20:46 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 21-Jun-86 08:56:38 EDT References: <8606171712.AA03947@cory.Berkeley.EDU> Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: mwm@ucbopal.UUCP (Mike Meyer) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 25 In article <8606171712.AA03947@cory.Berkeley.EDU> dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon) writes: > > A 68020 Amiga running at 14Mhz does indeed blow away a 785... but only >in terms of processor speed. The 785 still has: > > -virtual memory (doesn't crash when your program is screwed) > -a bus bandwidth at least an order of magnitude faster, > -a PDP11-something co-processor to handle all the low speed > serial > -most of the other hardware is intelligent and doesn't need the > CPU watching over it (for instance, the disk controllers). > > > But then again, the cost difference and power requirements are >such that I would probably go with the amiga. > > -Matt But Matt, where are you going to buy 48 or so serial ports to hang users off the Amiga :-). Lesson one in buying a computer: CPU does not a computer make. Go see net.arch for comments about the AT&T 7300 vs. the VAX 780.