Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!ti-csl!haddock
From: haddock@ti-csl
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: 1.2 RUN command STILL ISN'T FIXED!
Message-ID: <9300011@ti-csl>
Date: Sat, 21-Jun-86 21:51:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ti-csl.9300011
Posted: Sat Jun 21 21:51:00 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 25-Jun-86 03:59:51 EDT
Lines: 28
Nf-ID: #R:<8606181750.AA01146@cory.Berkele:-38:ti-csl:9300011:000:1093
Nf-From: ti-csl!haddock    Jun 21 20:51:00 1986


	>/* ---------- "1.2 RUN command STILL ISN'T FIXED!" ---------- */

	>	Come on, will you please stop setting the priority of my 'run'
	>processes to -5 ????? pretty please?  And to top that, I can't seem to
	>find where in the code the priority is determined.

I'm of the belief that RUN wasn't and isn't broken.   Maybe an
option to RUN would be appropriate???

	>	Otherwise, I'm going to have to automagically set the priority
	>in the first line of my code to make sure it's 0, and I don't want to
	>do that (it isn't good form) 	but...

But nothing!!!  If you wanted to change the priority on a Unix process
you'd need to use `renice' or use `nice' on invocation of your program.
This being the case you can certainly use `Cpri'.

Sorry Matt, but you whine too much.

				-Rusty-

================================================================
*hardcopy*		*electr{onic, ic}*
Rusty Haddock		ARPA:  Haddock%TI-CSL@CSNET-RELAY.ARPA
POB 226015 M/S 238	CSNET: Haddock@TI-CSL
Texas Instruments Inc.	USENET: {ut-sally,convex!smu,texsun}!ti-csl!haddock
Dallas, Texas 75266	VOICE: (214) 995-0330