Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!ucbvax!jade!eris!mwm
From: mwm@eris.berkeley.edu
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: 1.2 RUN command STILL ISN'T FIXED!
Message-ID: <907@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Tue, 24-Jun-86 17:36:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: jade.907
Posted: Tue Jun 24 17:36:21 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jun-86 07:11:19 EDT
References: <9300011@ti-csl> <1340@amiga.amiga.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: mwm@eris.UUCP ()
Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica
Lines: 22

In article <1340@amiga.amiga.UUCP> neil@rocky.UUCP (Neil Katin) writes:
>Sigh.  Such flaming about such small issues.  I have to admit that I
>agree on Matt on this one.  The change (vis-a-vis run and setting
>priority to -5) has been made several times, but keeps on getting
>lost due to some disagreement here.  Beta-2 had is set to 5 less that
>the parents priority (better than an absolute -5).
>
>Beta-4 will leave the priority of the child task the same as the parents.
>Undoubtedly some will think this is a change for the worse.
>
>	Neil Katin
>	Commodore-Amiga Inc.


How about making it an option, like:

RUN PRI=PRIORITY/K,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

I'll leave figuring out how to specify both absolute and relative
priorities as a problem for the reader :-).

	<mike