Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!columbia!caip!nike!cad!ucbvax!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!tikal!hplsla!jamesv
From: jamesv@hplsla.UUCP (jamesv)
Newsgroups: net.micro.cbm
Subject: Re: Which C compiler is better?.
Message-ID: <6300002@hplsla.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Jun-86 12:57:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hplsla.6300002
Posted: Fri Jun  6 12:57:00 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Jun-86 06:31:02 EDT
References: <507@noscvax.UUCP>
Lines: 11
Nf-ID: #R:noscvax:-50700:hplsla:6300002:000:453
Nf-From: hplsla!jamesv    Jun  6 09:57:00 1986


>                   The C-Power object code runs faster than any other compiler
> I've used on the 64; a Seive benchmark I ran executed in 40 seconds for the
> Proline compiler, 90 seconds in PROMAL, about 9 minutes in PASCAL, and 1 1/2
> hours or so in C128 BASIC.

Who's Pascal compiler are you using Dave?  I'm not disputing your results
but the large difference between your results for C and Pascal surprise me.

James Vasil
(hplabs!hplsla!jamesv)