Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!cbmvax!daveh
From: daveh@cbmvax.cbm.UUCP (Dave Haynie)
Newsgroups: net.micro.cbm
Subject: Re: Byte 128 review and question about 64 review (short) :-)
Message-ID: <471@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Jun-86 16:11:50 EDT
Article-I.D.: cbmvax.471
Posted: Mon Jun 30 16:11:50 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 1-Jul-86 04:16:54 EDT
References: <1895@gitpyr.UUCP>
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 22

> 
>    There is a (favorable) review of the Commodore 128 in the July Byte
> magazine.
>    I was wondering, didn't Byte ever review the Commodore 64?  If so, I'd like
> to see it.  I haven't been able to find what issue it is in, if it exists at
> all.  Can anybody help me on this?
> 

My, how timely!  If they had only waited until the August issue, they would
have been in time for the C128's first birthday.  Sounds like they 
anti-scooped the industry on this one.  I'll have to read it anyway, maybe
they made up for the time frame by including more in-depth information.


-- 
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Dave Haynie    {caip,ihnp4,allegra,seismo}!cbmvax!daveh

   A quote usually goes here, but its currently being rennovated.

	These opinions are my own, though for a small fee they be yours too.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/