Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!caip!seismo!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!spice.cs.cmu.edu!tdn From: tdn@spice.cs.cmu.edu (Thomas Newton) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Re: Fascist Licensing Agreement Message-ID: <1016@spice.cs.cmu.edu> Date: Thu, 19-Jun-86 03:26:51 EDT Article-I.D.: spice.1016 Posted: Thu Jun 19 03:26:51 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 21-Jun-86 09:07:10 EDT Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI Lines: 29 Actually, I just thought of something that may even have a negative effect on those who are willing to put up with the restrictions I singled out. One clause reads "YOU MAY NOT MODIFY ... THE SOFTWARE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART ..." Now what constitutes modifying the software? What about: (1) Installing or removing fonts I don't think of this as modifying the software, but some lawyer might, since it certainly changes its behavior (the bits you see on the screen will reflect whether a requested font and size are present in the System file or not, etc.) (2) Installing or removing desk accessories such as MockWrite which can be characterized as "taking snapshots and leaving footprints" (3) Installing or removing desk accessories such as SkipFinder, Control Panel, or the Dvorak keyboard layout DA which are meant to have some direct effect on the way in which the system operates. (4) Installing INITS, FKEYS, drivers for SCSI devices (like hard disks), etc. which may have effects as in (2) or as in (3). Assuming that any one of these things count as "modifying the software" (and I haven't yet heard of a Mac owner who doesn't customize their System file), this makes the electronically-distributed System useless even on a single Mac. Does anyone still believe this is a perfectly reasonable license? Any bets as to what happens when a court finds out just what the chances are that anybody can obey all the points of the license without using the System disk only as a paperweight? Ephraim's point is well-taken. -- Thomas Newton