Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!sun!hoptoad!farren
From: farren@hoptoad.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.ns32k
Subject: Re: Re: Re: National's 32332 (Apples and oranges really)
Message-ID: <865@hoptoad.uucp>
Date: Mon, 16-Jun-86 04:36:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: hoptoad.865
Posted: Mon Jun 16 04:36:36 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 16-Jun-86 17:52:34 EDT
References: <746@usl.UUCP> <253@spar.UUCP> <2793@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Reply-To: farren@hoptoad.UUCP (Mike Farren)
Distribution: na
Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco
Lines: 17

In article <367@tolerant.UUCP> kevin@tolerant.UUCP (Kevin Flory) writes:
>
>The National 32032, 32332, and the Motorola 680XX both have a much better 
>instuction set than the Intel 8086, 186, 286, and 386. This may not be
>as noticible at the machine code level, but when in compiled codes, especialy
>'C', the National and Motorola instrucitons sets are much more efficient.

Executable file sizes, 6502 assembler program:

Intel, 8086, Microsoft C 3.0 -> 15110
Motorola 68000, UniSoft cc   -> 19500

This is more efficient?

----------------
Mike Farren
hoptoad!farren