Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!infoswx!bees
From: bees@infoswx.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.ns32k
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <112100001@infoswx>
Date: Fri, 13-Jun-86 12:32:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: infoswx.112100001
Posted: Fri Jun 13 12:32:00 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 17-Jun-86 22:06:24 EDT
References: <55@intelca.UUCP>
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #R:intelca.UUCP:55:infoswx:112100001:000:665
Nf-From: infoswx.UUCP!bees    Jun 13 11:32:00 1986


> 	I think someone should run the Dhrystone benchmarks on a 32332
> machine otherwise, I'd be force to to conclude that the part really
> wasn't that fast.
> -- 
> Clif Purkiser, Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
> HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROPROCESSORS
> {pur-ee,hplabs,amd,scgvaxd,dual,idi,omsvax}!intelca!clif

	Let's see Clif, by that 'logic' -

	"I think someone should run 4.2BSD or System V, Rel 2 on an 80386
  machine, otherwise, I'd be forced to conclude that the part really can't
  run demand-paged virtual UN*X."

	Pretty silly, huh! :-)

Gary Rima, National Semiconductor, Dallas, TX
EVEN HIGHER PERFORMANCE MICROPROCESSORS :-)
{convex!infoswx,nsc!nsc16}!tx-nsc!rima