Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!cca!dee From: dee@cca.UUCP (Donald Eastlake) Newsgroups: net.news,net.politics,net.legal Subject: Re: Towards making hosts and their admin free from a criminal offence Message-ID: <8113@cca.UUCP> Date: Thu, 29-May-86 13:59:46 EDT Article-I.D.: cca.8113 Posted: Thu May 29 13:59:46 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 4-Jun-86 00:03:57 EDT References: <611@bu-cs.UUCP> <164@comp.lancs.ac.uk> <20663@styx.UUCP> <1259@mulga.OZ> <2026@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU> Reply-To: dee@cca.UUCP (Donald Eastlake) Distribution: net Organization: Computer Corp. of America, Cambridge Lines: 26 Xref: linus net.news:4097 net.politics:15719 net.legal:3197 It seems to me that a lot of this is oversimplified. A sovereign nation can make anything it wants illegal, including acts outside its borders. If a US citizen commited espionage by traveling to a foreign country and while in that foreign country originating a message that revelead certain information to a foreign government with the intent of injuring the United States, they would be committing a crime. For example, if I went to Japan (which has no law against espionage as far as I know) and while there electronically commnicated secrets to the Tokyo embassy of the USSR I would clearly be inviolation of US law and might even be extraditable depending on the treaties between US&Japan. Most people would think this was a reasonable extra-territorial application of criminal law. One can think of lots of other examples. What if I sit in country A and send and receive lots of messages for the purpose of managing an organized crime syndicate in country B? How much difference should it make what country I am a citizen or national of? What if country A is the United States and country B is Canada and the Canadian crime is the distribution in Canada of hate material that I know is false which urges the extermination of all X (Jews, blacks, ... whatever), something which would be allowed in the United States? Anyway, my point is that real situations can be complicated and I think that the claim that you can arbitrarily disseminate communications in one country ignoring all other country's laws is ridiculous. -- +1 617-492-8860 Donald E. Eastlake, III ARPA: dee@CCA-UNIX usenet: {decvax,linus}!cca!dee