Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!spar!turtlevax!weitek!robert From: robert@weitek.UUCP Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.news.adm Subject: Re: In praise of net.biz--I mean net.{rumor,suicide} Message-ID: <441@weitek.UUCP> Date: Thu, 5-Jun-86 20:53:07 EDT Article-I.D.: weitek.441 Posted: Thu Jun 5 20:53:07 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 6-Jun-86 20:00:48 EDT References: <2341@seismo.CSS.GOV> <1001@k.cs.cmu.edu> <14076@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <345@andromeda.RUTGERS.EDU> Distribution: na Organization: Weitek Corp. Sunnyvale Ca. Lines: 36 Summary: Call for talk.complain-about-other-people's-postings Xref: decwrl net.news.group:5271 net.news.adm:787 In article <345@andromeda.RUTGERS.EDU>, marco@andromeda.RUTGERS.EDU (the wharf rat) writes: [... a lot of quoted material. Deleted for brevity...] > On the assumption that .news.group will have missed the > original, I have included most of it. > Would you feel the same way if people started posting > multi-hundred-line flames and questionable jokes in net.math ? > What would _your_ reaction be if the signal-to-noise in your > favorite groups suddenly began to approach zero because some > bizzaroid decided that it would be cute to hold cross-country > flaming contests ? > [... and so on...] > W.rat Has anyone estimated the percent of postings that are complaints about what other people are posting? It seems that every prig on the net spends his time lowering the signal-to-noise level by blathering on about the signal-to-noise ratio. These self-important guardians of the net don't seem to have any ethics about it, either. They'll include long articles are part of their complaints about people who include long articles, bitch about posting to inappropriate newsgroups in inappropriate newsgroups (you shouldn't bitch about postings in net.rumor unless your complaint is itself a rumor. Have some respect!), and generally flap about and squawk a lot. These stuffed shirts are the very bizarroids that they complain about. Their sole function on the net seems to be reducing the S/N ratio of people's favorite newsgroups by indulging in cross-country flaming contests. How about creating a talk.hypocrites or talk.prigs for these people? -- Robert Plamondon UUCP: {turtlevax, cae780}!weitek!robert