Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!pyramid!hplabs!rodrique
From: rodrique@hplabs.UUCP (Mike Rodriquez)
Newsgroups: net.news.adm
Subject: Re: Junker
Message-ID: <2538@hplabs.hplabs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 27-Jun-86 16:35:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: hplabs.2538
Posted: Fri Jun 27 16:35:12 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 29-Jun-86 01:57:28 EDT
References: <282@ubc-cs.UUCP> <1509@brl-smoke.ARPA> <289@ubc-cs.UUCP> <9896@cgl.ucsf.edu.ucsfcgl.UUCP>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories
Lines: 11


   I am not going to debate the relative merits of junker except
to say that if you don't understand why it is a bad idea to mangle
usenet articles, maybe you don't belong on usenet.  Volume of
traffic *will* be dealt with.....groups may not be carried by
a given site, etc, but for those groups that are carried, the
articles should be sent intact.  Having said that, let me also
go on record as stating that hplabs absolutely will not use
junker.  In fact, we will drop our feeds to any sites that
do choose to use it.
Mike Rodriquez