Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!seismo!gatech!amdcad!phil From: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) Newsgroups: net.news.adm Subject: Re: Line eater again (mod.comp-soc)? Message-ID: <12173@amdcad.UUCP> Date: Sun, 29-Jun-86 14:45:14 EDT Article-I.D.: amdcad.12173 Posted: Sun Jun 29 14:45:14 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 30-Jun-86 05:57:01 EDT References: <317@maynard.UUCP> Reply-To: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) Distribution: net Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California Lines: 61 Summary: not the line eater It is NOT the line eater. I got mangled stuff through decwrl and decwrl is pretty clean. As final proof, I got two copies of #21, one mangled and one unmangled through the same path. (The paths for these articles include pyramid which is also a clean site. I have other mangled articles which went amdcad!decwrl!hplabs!hplabsc!taylor.) They were posted at two different times with two different message ids. I suspect more notes stupidity at hplabs. I enclose the head of these two articles. I suggest we sent core dumps to hplabs!root and the inventor of notes. ==> 133 <== Article 133 of mod.comp-soc: Relay-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site amdcad.UUCP Path: amdcad!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!hplabsc!taylor From: taylor@hplabsc.UUCP (Dave Taylor) Newsgroups: mod.comp-soc Subject: Computers and Society Digest, #21 Message-ID: <329@hplabsc.UUCP> Date: 25 Jun 86 18:16:58 GMT Date-Received: 26 Jun 86 10:57:17 GMT Reply-To: hplabs!taylor (The Moderator) Organization: Hewlett Packard Labs, Palo Alto CA Lines: 159 Approved: taylor@hplabs -------- Computers and Society Digest, Number 21 Monday, May 12th 1986 Topics of discussion in this issue... ==> 134 <== Article 134 of mod.comp-soc: Relay-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site amdcad.UUCP Path: amdcad!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!hplabsc!taylor From: taylor@hplabsc.UUCP (Dave Taylor) Newsgroups: mod.comp-soc Subject: Computers and Society Digest, #21 Message-ID: <336@hplabsc.UUCP> Date: 27 Jun 86 18:53:49 GMT Date-Received: 28 Jun 86 03:59:13 GMT Reply-To: hplabs!taylor (The Moderator) Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Lines: 137 Approved: taylor@hplabs esented a finalizing and codifying process which encouraged well thought-out communication. Care needed to be taken, since a single error could necessitate re-typing the entire letter or document. There is a hidden risk in the new media, in that they have enabled us to -- Bring back the phone company! Phil Ngai +1 408 749 5720 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.dec.com