Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!oz.Berkeley.EDU!shers
From: shers@oz.Berkeley.EDU (Alex Sherstinsky)
Newsgroups: net.poems
Subject: Responses to "No Choice"
Message-ID: <14570@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Tue, 24-Jun-86 23:30:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.14570
Posted: Tue Jun 24 23:30:06 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 26-Jun-86 04:15:56 EDT
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: shers@oz.Berkeley.EDU (Alex Sherstinsky)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 20

Dear Mr. Bing:

I was pleased to see a reply to my poem "No Choice" coming from the net.

Yet, with all due respect for the reader and a genuine interest in
criticism, I found your remarks, such as "[a line] deleted for the sake 
of sanity" and "is this guy for real", not constructive at all.  

I almost resent the way you dispose of the work that took me two weeks of
composing and many years of observation.  I would rather appreciate a reply
containing an earnest discussion of content with helpful suggestions for the
improvement of style.

Sincerely,

Alex Sherstinsky 

P. S.:	I posted this reply to the net because the mail kept bouncing back
	when I tried to use the mail's "R" command.  Any flames caused by the
	presence of this article on the net are not intentional.