Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!pyramid!hplabs!amdahl!sjl From: sjl@amdahl.UUCP (Steve Langdon) Newsgroups: net.text,net.unix Subject: Re: Troff for the HP LaserJet Message-ID: <3292@amdahl.UUCP> Date: Sun, 1-Jun-86 17:12:19 EDT Article-I.D.: amdahl.3292 Posted: Sun Jun 1 17:12:19 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 3-Jun-86 22:39:54 EDT References: <196@bsdpkh.UUCP> <655@bu-cs.UUCP> <185@elan.UUCP> <477@hropus.UUCP> Reply-To: sjl@amdahl.UUCP (Steve Langdon) Organization: Amdahl Corp, Advanced Systems Planning Lines: 55 Keywords: LaserJet DWB troff PIC ELAN Xref: linus net.text:1017 net.unix:7327 Summary: Ask more than one user before judging software In article <477@hropus.UUCP> jrw@hropus.UUCP (Bill Rieken) writes: [responding to information that ELAN offers a supported version of DWB] > Ask a person who owns one. I would suggest you ask a few other users before accepting this casual put-down. > 1) ELAN's DWB software is no better than AT&T's. > > AT&T's DWB prints just fine on my lj+. Note the use of lj+. I believe that the ELAN product supports both the lj and the lj+. I would also like to get a better definition of what "prints just fine" means. It seems odd that ELAN and at least one other company would spend a fair amount of effort on support of this printer if AT&T supported it in the standard DWB distribution. > 2) ELAN's 'pic' can only print trivial diagrams. > > Four elipses with eight arrow arcs caused "error 21" > (the page formatting process is not fast enough for > the printer) on my lj+. > > AUTOCAD, on the other hand, generates top-quality Space Shuttle graphics > on the same printer! This appears to be a marvelous example of using an apparently relevant example to try and get people to accept what are probably false conclusions. Bill Rieken may be wasted in the computer field when he has such promise as a politician. A few points that readers might want to consider: 1) Why is the comparison not made to AT&T's DWB? Does it support PIC on the lj or lj+? 2) The example chosen may well be close to the worst case for the printer. I suspect that ellipses and arcs have to be drawn point by point while other simpler shapes can use higher level commands. 3) What are "Space Shuttle graphics"? It sounds impressive, but it is rather hard to tell exactly what is being described. I have seen the ELAN product do a nice job of printing Mac generated graphics on a lj (a copy of Escher's waterfall picture). I have no connection with ELAN. Ken Greer (the owner) used to work here at Amdahl as a consultant. This allowed me to see some of the results of ELAN's package even though we do not use it. -- Stephen J. Langdon ...!{ihnp4,cbosgd,hplabs,sun}!amdahl!sjl [ The article above is not an official statement from any organization in the known universe. ]