Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!pwa-b!utah-gr!thomas From: thomas@utah-gr.UUCP Newsgroups: net.decus,net.unix,net.usenix Subject: Re: Favorite operating systems query Message-ID: <1747@utah-gr.UUCP> Date: Tue, 17-Jun-86 13:18:56 EDT Article-I.D.: utah-gr.1747 Posted: Tue Jun 17 13:18:56 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 19-Jun-86 03:58:24 EDT References: <339@valid.UUCP> <452@geowhiz.UUCP> Reply-To: thomas@utah-gr.UUCP (Spencer W. Thomas) Distribution: net Organization: University of Utah CS Dept Lines: 38 Keywords: VMS, Multics, UNIX, fanaticism Xref: linus net.decus:340 net.unix:7480 net.usenix:544 In article <452@geowhiz.UUCP> larry@geowhiz.UUCP (Larry McVoy) writes: >1) the BSD fortran compiler is the worst excuse for a compiler the world has > ever seen (reports of 4 to 400 times slower than VMS fortran). Ultrix(tm) now comes with the "VMS" Fortran compiler (per report). > >3) Likewise with DCL (Dec Command Language). It's like sh with more obscurity. This is a plus?? >4) EDT - the VMS screen editor. Somebody already fixed this by writing an emacs > interface to emulate EDT. See (3). >6) File system. Why, oh, why, must the Unix file system be so fragile? VMS > never loses your files. I can count on the fingers of one foot the number of times I have lost a file due to "file system fragility" in the last 5 years on a Unix system. This "myth" is just that, and it's time to lay it to rest. >8) Robustness. VMS almost *never* crashes. Unix crashes all the time. See (6). Well, not quite that good. But the number of crashes not related to something like device driver development or installation of a half-baked remote file system has been VERY small at our site. I have seen a Vax stay up between PMs (every three months). Re: mail (one of your unnumbered comments). I think that a system that requires a remote machine to be up in order for you to send mail to someone on that system s**ks the big one. Maybe they've fixed it, but I doubt it. I remember watching a friend in France trying to send mail to Massachusetts, and having it fail because a connection couldn't be established to the remote machine *at that time*. No queueing, just try to send it later! Sheesh! Also, when was the last time you could run VMS on a Sun, or an Apollo, or a Gould, or a Pyramid, or a Cray, or .... 'Nuff said. -- =Spencer ({ihnp4,decvax}!utah-cs!thomas, thomas@utah-cs.ARPA)