Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!cbosgd!ucbvax!AC.UK!CCFD8%UK.AC.SUSSEX.VAX2
From: CCFD8%UK.AC.SUSSEX.VAX2@AC.UK
Newsgroups: mod.computers.vax
Subject: Re: psi mail through gateways
Message-ID: <8607081742.AA17048@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Tue, 8-Jul-86 13:43:02 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8607081742.AA17048
Posted: Tue Jul  8 13:43:02 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 8-Jul-86 23:40:07 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 21
Approved: info-vax@sri-kl.arpa


>> PSI -MAIL doesn't have the intelligence to go through gateways.

>You wrote this in info-vax so I assume you are refering to PSI on
>VAX/VMS. I can't find any problem whatsoever in using PSI-mail
>thru gateways. You can send mail to me at the address
>PSI%240200100303::JNET%SEQZ51::MATTS
>and I receive it loud and clear. How does your problems show?

My statement stands; the fact that you specified JNET% means that you
are invoking a user application to hook into VMSmail as does PSImail;
ie PSI% invokes and image called psi_mailshr.exe to transmit over a
local psi network; jnet% will invoke an image called jnet_mailshr.exe
at location 240200100303 to handle the local gateway connection there.
PSImail does NOT have the intelligence to do it directly.

(By the way, I would not be able to mail you via
PSI%240200100303::JNET%SEQZ51::MATTS because I don't have a direct
connection to PSS, and, as I said, (ad nauseaum) PSImail does NOT
have the intelligence to link to a different network via a gateway
(phew)