Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!cbosgd!ihnp4!cuae2!usenet@cuae2.ATT.COM
From: usenet@cuae2.ATT.COM
Newsgroups: mod.newprod
Subject: Administrivia
Message-ID: <2262@cuae2.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 7-Jul-86 12:26:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: cuae2.2262
Posted: Mon Jul  7 12:26:44 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 7-Jul-86 23:29:12 EDT
Sender: usenet@cuae2.UUCP
Organization: AT&T - /app/eng, Lisle, IL
Lines: 27
Approved: usenet@cuae2.UUCP

This message is mainly to try to be sure that everyone is aware that
the 68010 announcement from NetResults was the victim of an amazing
set of circumstances that made it *appear* bogus.  I have talked with
the submitter of the article at the phone number that wasn't working
last week when I checked.  I have talked with the president of the
telemarketing firm that is running the "800" service for NetResults.
He made it clear that it was his firm's fault, and not NetResults'.

I've also talked with NetResults' contact at Convergent Technologies,
who also assures me that NetResults is a real company dealing with C.T.

I'd encourage you to give NetResults the same chance that you would have
had the mess not occurred.  I apologize for any confusions or problems I
may have contributed to.  The person from NetResults that I spoke with
seemed genuinely concerned and professional.

I'd also like to thank all those who sent in suggestions.  I appreciate
your concerns and will consider your suggestions, even though this
incident doesn't require any special further action.  I'd encourage
you to send in any suggestion that you think may help mod.newprod be
a more useful/better service.  Thanks.
-- 
Ron Heiby {NAC|ihnp4}!cuae2!usenet   Moderator: mod.newprod & mod.os.unix
AT&T-IS, /app/eng, Lisle, IL	(312) 810-6109
Submissions should go to newprod@cbosgd.uucp.
Comments to the moderator should go to newprod-request@cbosgd.uucp.
Requests for information should go to the author of the message.