Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!nike!ll-xn!cit-vax!tybalt.caltech.edu!rat
From: rat@tybalt.caltech.edu.Caltech.Edu@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu (Ray Trent)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Opinion and law (was Re: fetuses, caterpillars, etc.)
Message-ID: <877@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Date: Sat, 9-Aug-86 00:25:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: cit-vax.877
Posted: Sat Aug  9 00:25:30 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 10-Aug-86 03:38:57 EDT
References: <1619@videovax> <1655@videovax> <2504@jhunix.UUCP> <1677@videovax> <683@bunkerb.UUCP> <509@andromeda.RUTGERS.EDU>
Sender: news@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu
Reply-To: rat@tybalt.caltech.edu.UUCP ()
Distribution: na
Organization: Calfornia Institute of Technology
Lines: 15

In article <509@andromeda.RUTGERS.EDU> marco@andromeda.RUTGERS.EDU (the wharf rat) writes:
>The very fact that *ALL THIS IS YOUR OR MINE OR WHOMEVER'S OPINION* IS
>THE VERY REASON WE **SHOULD NOT PASS LAWS** ABOUT IT. 


How does it follow from "X is a matter of opinion" that "we should not
pass laws about X"?  Hint:  it doesn't.

--Paul V. "Who's side am I on, anyway?" Torek
DISCLAIMER:  These views are not necessarily Ray's.


				../ray\..
				rat@tybalt.caltech.edu
				trent@cit-vax.caltech.edu