Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watrose.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watrose!cdshaw From: cdshaw@watrose.UUCP (Chris Shaw) Newsgroups: net.arch Subject: Re: Current Status of Karp Challenge Message-ID: <8108@watrose.UUCP> Date: Sun, 27-Jul-86 23:43:21 EDT Article-I.D.: watrose.8108 Posted: Sun Jul 27 23:43:21 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 28-Jul-86 03:58:10 EDT References: <1578@ames.UUCP> Reply-To: cdshaw@watrose.UUCP (Chris Shaw) Distribution: net Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 38 Summary: Pretty easy In article <1578@ames.UUCP> eugene@ames.UUCP (Eugene Miya) writes: >First, there is some misunderstanding about the challenge. The challenge >was to demonstrate some factor of 100 simple speedup of some program >running on a computer. So, the Connection Machine with 64K processors >falls down in two areas: 1) the computer must be an MIMD rather than >SIMD type (Multiple Instruction Stream Multiple Data Stream from >Flynn's [1966] classification scheme). 2) The program must be capable of >running on a single CPU of said computer. > >Second, the only person to even suggest a possible challenge had an ICL DAP. > >--eugene miya > NASA Ames Research Center Actually, someone with a 128-node hypercube machine could probably do this. Finding eigenvalues from a tridiagonal matrix using Bisection is very parallel. Cleve Moler has a routine which does this. We have run it here at Waterloo on our 64-node Intel hypercube, and the speedup attained by simply throwing processors at the problem is remarkable. Unfortunately, I can't remember the numbers. Also, a local user has a Ray Tracing program which is almost entirely without communication, and could therefore run above the required speedup number. A local copy of the scene is kept on each node, and each processor is responsible for a scan line. The results are then sent back, and a new scan line is assigned. Given a 128-node hypercube, I would fully expect 126-127 or so speedup. Both applications fit the two requirements: The iPSC is MIMD, and they can both run on 1 node. So. Anyone got a spare iPSC-d6 (64 nodes) they could lend us? Also, since I can name two, would we get $200 ?? B-) Chris Shaw watmath!watcal!cdshaw or cdshaw@watmath University of Waterloo Bogus as HELL!!