Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!tektronix!teklds!copper!michaelk From: michaelk@copper.UUCP Newsgroups: net.audio,net.analog Subject: Re: need interconnect cable recommendations... Message-ID: <476@copper.UUCP> Date: Sun, 13-Jul-86 23:40:10 EDT Article-I.D.: copper.476 Posted: Sun Jul 13 23:40:10 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 14-Jul-86 19:53:49 EDT References: <2107@orca.UUCP> <926@ihu1g.UUCP> <1225@uwmcsd1.UUCP> Reply-To: michaelk@copper.UUCP (Michael Kersenbrock) Distribution: na Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR. Lines: 35 Xref: decwrl net.audio:3001 net.analog:968 >> stuff is impossible to solder (read: BAD CONNECTION). Finally, all RG-59 >> has a solid core, which, if you're concerned about skin effect, is decidedly >> not the thing to use as an interconnect. > 1) You might want to run the skin-effect program that I posted earlier. I wrote it for speakers but...use the impedance level in your interconnect instead of speaker impedence. Skin effect will actually be even less than calculated because: only one lead is 22 Ga. in coax, the "return" lead is a good bit better. I don't think you will find anything significant unless the (parallel) input capacitance of your next stage is incredibly large. 2) Conductors being solid-core does not "hurt" skin effect wise. At VHF frequencies (above 50 Mhz say) you can use a hollow tube and have the same impedance as a solid rod of the same diameter. Having copper in the middle doesn't hurt. At low frequencies it helps. Skin effect is why RG-59 can be made with a copper- plated iron conductor. RG-59 is primarily sold as TV cable (at RS) where the lowest frequency (channel 2) in the cable is over 50 Mhz (and channel 83 is MUCH higher). 3) If you would like a lower-capacitance interconnect you might try RG-62 that has a mostly-air dielectric. Depending where you get it, it costs little more than RG-59 which is about the same size . -- Mike Kersenbrock Tektronix Software Development Products Aloha, Oregon