Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!cbosgd!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!psuvax1!burdvax!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: net.bio,net.philosophy,net.religion
Subject: Re: 'flying saucer'(Actually alien visits)
Message-ID: <1353@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Jul-86 14:47:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: psivax.1353
Posted: Tue Jul 22 14:47:42 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 24-Jul-86 04:26:51 EDT
References: <8300@kestrel.ARPA> <403@quad1.UUCP> <326@parcvax.Xerox.COM> <1261@psivax.UUCP> <796@nbires.UUCP> <1270@psivax.UUCP> <15
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.bio:624 net.philosophy:6305 net.religion:10620

In article <153@cci632.UUCP> rb@ccird1.UUCP (Rex Ballard) writes:
>
>Seriously.  If something WERE intelligent enough to traverse the stars,
>wouldn't they either be so blatent that there would be no doubt (military
>occupation) or so subtle that there would be no way of knowing the difference?
>Why attract attention by flying around in "glowing orbs"?

        I agree, which is why I do not believe UFOs are actually
flying saucers. Thpugh, I do not think military occupation is the only
way they might end up being obvious. A government exploratory mission
would tend to be quite unmistakeable, as would a trading post.
--

                                Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen
ARPA: ??