Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!ucla-cs!electra!oleg
From: oleg@electra.cs.ucla.edu (Oleg "Kill the bastards" Kiselev)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.bio
Subject: Re: Birth Control
Message-ID: <129@curly.ucla-cs.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 24-Jul-86 22:58:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: curly.129
Posted: Thu Jul 24 22:58:48 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 27-Jul-86 01:47:36 EDT
References: <1052@umd5.UUCP> <939@frog.UUCP> <560@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU>
Reply-To: oleg@electra.UUCP (Oleg "Kill the bastards" Kiselev)
Distribution: net
Organization: Citizens' Committee to Stop Continental Drift
Lines: 13
Xref: watmath net.women:11614 net.bio:631

In article <153@gt-eedsp.UUCP> deb@gt-eedsp.UUCP (Deb Jackson) writes:
>The age of the sperm doesn't have an impact on the "encodings".  The genetic
>information is different in each sperm, be the age difference 10 minutes or
>10 years.  (At least that's what they thought when I studied bio.)

So then it is safe to assume that the BASIC encoding is the same (minus
radiation exposure damage), frozen sperm is in no way inferior to the
freshly produced one? (Just wondering if there are any OTHER reasons not to
have visectomy (sp?). Not that I will -- I am too paranoid and I believe in
disposable birth control methods)
"... having someone special for dinner?"	Oleg Kiselev
                          _Cannibal Girls_	oleg%OACVAX.BITNET
						oleg@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU