Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site water.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!water!watbun!kgdykes From: kgdykes@watbun.UUCP Newsgroups: net.cycle,net.auto,net.politics Subject: re Re re Seat belts, Helmets and Freedom of Choice Message-ID: <480@water.UUCP> Date: Wed, 30-Jul-86 03:38:11 EDT Article-I.D.: water.480 Posted: Wed Jul 30 03:38:11 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 30-Jul-86 06:50:52 EDT Sender: daemon@water.UUCP Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 29 Xref: watmath net.cycle:1866 net.auto:11955 net.politics:17829 >From: hsc@mtuxo.UUCP (h.cohen) > >> Motor vehicle safety lies within the OPERATION of vehicle and >>not trying to lessen the effects of a collision, like medicine, >If avoidance could eliminate essentially all of the problem, >then there would be no need for treatment. In the real world, clearly, >there is a need for both. People involved in 10-speed accidents can "greatly benefit" from helmets too! Where is the law? >> To many people helmets "obviously" help in the treatment side of >>accidents, there are studies that show how helmets actually >>cause more complicated injuries. >This is quite simply not true. Opponents of helmet laws do their SIMPLY NOT TRUE?!? those studies do exists, i have read them over the years, are you going to make me dig thru reference libraries?? I said, and keep saying, it is NOT CUT AND DRY (ie: not SIMPLE at all) >>Also, the worst part of head injuries >>is the SUDDEN DECELERATION of the brain against the skull, >>no helment can help that. >Helmets have three primary functions: protection from abrasion, >penetration, and decelleration. >...by the crushable liner. Decelleration of the brain against the skull >can be reduced by two orders of magnitude by a helmet. LEGAL helmets can be open-faced, where is the padding? My last severe accident I slid on MY FACE with OPEN helmet for about 10 yards - lost my beard and a lot of lower lip. Good headache. Good abrasion. ...to be continued... (stupid mailer)