Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!ucla-cs!sdcrdcf!ism780c!darryl From: darryl@ism780c.UUCP (Darryl Richman) Newsgroups: net.cycle,net.auto Subject: Re: re Seat belts, Helmets and Freedom of Choice Message-ID: <3016@ism780c.UUCP> Date: Tue, 29-Jul-86 19:11:29 EDT Article-I.D.: ism780c.3016 Posted: Tue Jul 29 19:11:29 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 1-Aug-86 19:29:39 EDT References: <472@water.UUCP> Reply-To: darryl@ism780c.UUCP (Darryl Richman) Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA Lines: 35 Xref: watmath net.cycle:1879 net.auto:11992 In article <472@water.UUCP> kgdykes@watbun.UUCP writes: > To many people helmets "obviously" help in the treatment side of >accidents, there are studies that show how helmets actually >cause more complicated injuries. Oh, horsefeathers. Of course, there are *extremely unusual* situations where this is true, but the same can be said for seatbelts, or most any other safety device. Read the Hurt report to find out, statistically, how helmets save lives. (I believe he reports that, in the hundreds of accidents he investigated, none had injuries that were attributable to the helmet). The only common situation where helmets add to injuries is when a helpful bystander attmepts to remove one incorrectly. > Also, the worst part of head injuries >is the SUDDEN DECELERATION of the brain against the skull, >no helment can help that. Yes, certainly. Just like the fellow a few months back who wrote to "Cycle" (I think) saying that it would take more than 6 inches of foam just to begin to absorb an impact. If helmets are nearly useless, why do all the racers wear them (and don't answer that the AMA requires it -- the racers instituted mandatory helmets themselves). >EDUCATE, DON'T LEGISLATE! NOW we agree. > - Ken Dykes > Biker's Rights of Ontario, Canada. > {ihnp4,decvax,allegra,utzoo}!watmath!watbun!kgdykes --Darryl Richman, INTERACTIVE Systems Corp. ...!cca!ima!ism780!darryl The views expressed above are my opinions only.