Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!mnetor!lsuc!watmath!clyde!caip!ut-sally!pyramid!decwrl!sun!mwicks
From: mwicks@sun.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.nlang,net.travel,net.micro.pc,net.micro.apple,net.database,net.wanted,net.politics,net.jobs
Subject: Re: Reply to 'Update #2 on technical travel to Nicaragua'
Message-ID: <5227@sun.uucp>
Date: Fri, 18-Jul-86 11:23:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: sun.5227
Posted: Fri Jul 18 11:23:58 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Jul-86 22:32:31 EDT
References: <3968@decwrl.DEC.COM> <601@zaphod.UUCP>
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Lines: 23
Xref: utcs net.nlang:4690 net.travel:2755 net.micro.pc:9112 net.micro.apple:2895 net.database:351 net.wanted:9150 junk:1517 net.jobs:2524


  In article<3968@decwrl.DEC.COM> <601@zaphod.UUCP>timm@zaphod.UUCP (Tim Melanchuk) writes:
> I support the Nicaragua government although I don't support abusing 
> usenet conventions.  I am *very* against American policy and intervention
> in the region and dislike the holier than thou attitude of American
> support versus Russian.  I am Canadian though and have somewhat of
> a less biased opinion.  I'm curious about how many non-Americans
> support American policy in Nicaragua.  Most of the news and editorials
> I see in Canada about the conflict seems to highlight American 
> exagerations and/or lies about events and tends to favor a non-military
> solution and letting the region sort out its own problems.
> -- 
> A Canadian is someone who knows how to make love in a canoe.
> 
> Tim Melanchuk		{ihnp4|alberta}!sask!zaphod!timm
  
       
      I fail to see the significance in posting this article to net.travel.
  It appears to me to be purely a POLITICAL statement that I should see in
  net.politics, if I so desire. Why this is posted to 10 different groups
  is beyond me.

  Michael L. Wicks