Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcvax!diku!krus From: krus@diku.UUCP (Lars Povlsen) Newsgroups: net.dcom Subject: Re: Re: Re: TCP/IP terminal concentrators Message-ID: <2535@diku.UUCP> Date: Thu, 24-Jul-86 17:22:31 EDT Article-I.D.: diku.2535 Posted: Thu Jul 24 17:22:31 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 30-Jul-86 01:09:37 EDT References: <890@bu-cs.UUCP> <12236@amdcad.UUCP> <2529@diku.UUCP> <12364@amdcad.UUCP> Organization: DIKU, U of Copenhagen, DK Lines: 45 In article <12364@amdcad.UUCP> phil@amdcad.UUCP writes: >In article <2529@diku.UUCP> krus@diku.UUCP (Lars Povlsen) writes: >>In article <12236@amdcad.UUCP> phil@amdcad.UUCP writes: >>>This is an advantage. Much better than running around updating forty >>>or fifty floppies like the CS100 requires. (We don't have Ethernet >>>terminal servers in large scale use but when we do we'll have that >>>many to maintain.) >> >>If you have non diskbased cs100 with a NCS150 control server, you will >>only need one copy of the software for cs100's or cs1's on the >>network. >We have multiple Unix boxes which can make perfectly good boot >servers. Why should I buy a proprietary solution like an NCS150 when >Encore supplies free boot server source code? And don't forget you're >not just buying one NCS150, you have to buy two for each site if you >don't want all your terminal servers down when the NCS150 is down. >(The NCS150 is used for name service and boot service, I think?) Yes, its used for both, but they will be down anyway, since the doubled service only applies to the nameserver, not software & configuration info. >(ask me about how Bridge Comm violates the 802.3 AUI cable connector >spec, causing AUI connections to be unreliable.) The connector is a tragedy, agreed, we had a lot of trouble, and still has. But since we were only aware of the connection to be unreliable, not what being the cause, please follow this up. I think its necessary to stress that I'm not trying to sell anybody anything from BCI (other than 20 CS100's at certain bad days ;-). In fact, I would probably believe *anybody* saying they had a better box than the CS100 and related products. I was just commenting on the boot service that IS available. I am sad to say I haven't any knowledge of the Annex. From what I hear in this forum this is clearly a handicap. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lars Povlsen, diku!krus/diku!postmaster Institute of Datalogy, University of Copenhagen --------------------------------------------------------------------------