Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!seismo!ut-sally!pyramid!voder!kontron!cramer From: cramer@kontron.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) Newsgroups: net.followup Subject: Re: New Chernobyl figures Message-ID: <884@kontron.UUCP> Date: Mon, 7-Jul-86 12:56:00 EDT Article-I.D.: kontron.884 Posted: Mon Jul 7 12:56:00 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 8-Jul-86 05:49:25 EDT References: <684@bu-cs.UUCP> <927@mmm.UUCP> <186@stracs.cs.strath.ac.uk> Organization: Kontron Electronics, Mt. View, CA Lines: 40 > In article <875@kontron.UUCP> cramer@kontron.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes: > > > How do you know that all hunter-gatherer societies had low social positions for > women? There seems to be a lot of evidence that many ancient tribes were > matriarchies. And how do you know what kind of health they enjoyed when > the environment could still support a hunter-gatherer economy? > I didn't say "all" hunter-gatherer societies. But just about all American Indian cultures fit into this category of sexual oppression. (And that's the example you were citing.) As for what kind of health they enjoyed: You are incredibly ignorant if you think the health problems were a function of how well they could support a hunter-gatherer economy. I'm really disturbed at how incredibly ignorant the "Let's all live with nature" sorts are about the health advances made just in the last two centuries. C-sections are a RECENT development. There are NO primitive cultures that had a solution to this problem. Breech delivery? Mother dies. Frequently the child dies. C-section is just ONE example, one near and dear to me because my wife had to have a C-section for our daughter. In a primitive culture, she would have died, slowly and in agony. Use your heads a little bit before you start idolizing primitive living. > > One more argument in favor of abandoning our present lifestyle... > > > Charlotte Allen No, one more argument in favor of abandoning government. Clayton E. Cramer