Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!ll-xn!mit-amt!mit-eddie!mit-trillian!henry
From: henry@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU (Henry Mensch)
Newsgroups: net.followup,net.motss
Subject: Re: Georgia vs Hardwick
Message-ID: <816@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 8-Jul-86 20:38:32 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-tril.816
Posted: Tue Jul  8 20:38:32 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 9-Jul-86 06:47:43 EDT
References: <146@ozdaltx.UUCP> <2490@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: henry@athena.mit.edu (Henry Mensch)
Organization: The People's Republic of Cambridge
Lines: 18
Keywords: freedom
Xref: watmath net.followup:6811 net.motss:3185

In article <2490@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU> ambar@mit-eddie.UUCP (Jean Marie Diaz) writes:
>
>This is not the only piece of flamage that I've seen on the net
>claiming that the Georgia sodomy law applies to both homo- and
>heterosexuals.  However, I read an article in the Boston Globe which
>said that the law only applied to oral/genital contact BETWEEN MEMBERS
>OF THE SAME SEX.

The Georgia law applies to everyone without regard to sex or sexual
orientation.  The Supreme Court decision deals particularly with
homosexuals; they chose not to consider similar acts among
heterosexual couples now.  See the editorial in today's (8 July '86)
*Boston Globe* for more.

-- 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Henry Mensch     |   Technical Writer  | MIT/Project Athena
henry@athena.mit.edu          ..!mit-eddie!mit-athena!henry