Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!andromeda!argus!ken From: ken@argus.UUCP (Kenneth Ng) Newsgroups: net.followup Subject: Re: FYI: VM systems on the net Message-ID: <349@argus.UUCP> Date: Tue, 15-Jul-86 21:31:28 EDT Article-I.D.: argus.349 Posted: Tue Jul 15 21:31:28 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 16-Jul-86 04:45:00 EDT References: <6340MW9@PSUVM> <-121460420@sysvis> Organization: NJ Inst of Tech., Newark NJ Lines: 50 In article <-121460420@sysvis>, george@sysvis.UUCP writes: > > > I would just like to take this opportunity to inform people that there are > > VM systems on the net now. We've been on for awhile and would now like to > > be considered in discussions. UN*X doesn't rule the world. In fact, it > > sucks. (Sorry, that was a flame and there is no more net.flame, boo hoo.) > > Ok, when posting sources think about us vm folks. And you vm folks, how > > about posting some relevant stuff! > > I heard that VM stands for Visceral Maggots. True? It's uncommon for an > "OS" to SUCK down about 40% of the total available machine cycles for overhead, > as does VM. That's why it wasn't tagged with an `OS' label, I'm sure. Who > needs VM? Who cares? IBM didn't have an official `C' compiler as of some > time ago so what are you going to do with sources that won't compile, and if > they did, the I/O is handled totally differently? Batch is bitch, Butch. Strange, I've been on an IBM 4361 for almost a year and have never used a batch process, practically everything is interactive. Also, VM has many I/O capabilities which are better than Un*x. For starters, the equivalent of the Un*x write(1) on VM does not go splattering all over whatever else is being displayed on the screen. By default it is displayed on a seperate screen, or if you write the control logic, you can even intercept the wwrites and do whatever you want with them. > If VM is so great, why > aren't all the "good" microcomputers [IBM/AT (-:] using it? I believe one of the higher PC models does use a variation of VM. But VM on a single process machine does not really make much sense. Furthermore a lot of VM's power is in its hardware implementation, the paging and lookaside tables for example. Lastly, is there really a reason why programs posted here have to be in C? -- Kenneth Ng: Post office: NJIT - CCCC, Newark New Jersey 07102 uucp(for a while) ihnp4!allegra!bellcore!argus!ken soon uucp:ken@argus.cccc.njit.edu bitnet(prefered) ken@njitcccc.bitnet or ken@orion.bitnet soon bitnet: ken@orion.cccc.njit.edu (We are VERY slowly moving to RFC 920, kicking and screaming) Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical, that is the only planet in the federation that can make that claim" Savaak: "He's so....human" Spock: "No one is perfect"