Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!topaz!uwvax!husc6!harvard!ut-sally!ut-ngp!kjm
From: kjm@ut-ngp.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: PRECEDENT FOR USE OF =
Message-ID: <3615@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 7-Jul-86 22:27:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.3615
Posted: Mon Jul  7 22:27:17 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 8-Jul-86 06:40:50 EDT
References: <1645@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Organization: UTexas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 58

[]

JUNG_E%SITVXA.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU (Edward Jung) posts the following missive:

>Although this may be read by all, it is targetted for
>Ken "Smurf Shredder" Montgomery at U Texas, self-acknowledged scum.

Member of HASA, you mean.  (BTW, Oleg, do I qualify as a charter member?)

>Why can't C be like everybody else?  Practically every language uses
>the equals sign, "=", to test for equality, not as an assignment operator.

Why should it be like everybody else?  Are you really advocating conformity
at the expense of innovative improvement?

>Everybody who's anybody knows that there is a problem in the use of "="
>for more than one purpose, a la BASIC and FORTRAN.

Ah, yes.  Once again, Usenetters, we have a personal attack.  (Not to
mention a confused missive-poster: "=" is only used for assignment in
FORTRAN.)

>Pascal resolves this
>problem by continuing to use "=" to testing and creating ":=" for
>assignments.  Kernighan and Ritchie, in their infinite wisdom, decide
>instead to use "=" for assignments and to create a new operator, "==" to
>test for equality.  Gee, that must have required brains, the brains of
>a 3 year old.

Oh, boy!  Another personal attack!  You must have been in a maximally
awful mood when you wrote this missive!

>If they had my brains, they would have used Pascal's method.  Better yet,
>they should have let someone else write up C.

Wow!  Rack up three for that man!  (Give him a cigar?  Maybe an exploding one?)


One completely reactionary statement.  Three personal attacks.  Statement Fu.
Operator Fu.  Confusion Fu.  Impressive.  Not positively.  Smurf-shredder says,
"Check it out!"

>Edward Jung, Stevens Institute of Technology
>JUNG_E@SITVXB.BITNET
>
>PS: Ken, I don't like your cat.

This is about as rational an opinion as the rest you've shown so far.

--
The above viewpoints are mine.  They are unrelated to
those of anyone else, including my cat and my employer.

Ken Montgomery  "Shredder-of-hapless-smurfs"
Member of HASA -- Heathen and Atheistic Scum Alliance
...!{ihnp4,allegra,seismo!ut-sally}!ut-ngp!kjm  [Usenet, when working]
kjm@ngp.{ARPA,UTEXAS.EDU}  [Old/New Internet; depends on nameserver operation]
kjm@ngp.CC.UTEXAS.EDU      [Very New Internet; may require nameserver operation]