Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!well!jjacobs
From: jjacobs@well.UUCP (Jeffrey Jacobs)
Newsgroups: net.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: 3-Lisp
Message-ID: <1500@well.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 26-Jul-86 14:50:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: well.1500
Posted: Sat Jul 26 14:50:16 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Jul-86 22:19:09 EDT
References: <137@utah-orion.UUCP> <1405@well.UUCP> <1000@kuling.UUCP> <1450@we
Organization: Whole Earth Lectronic Link, Sausalito, CA
Lines: 44

ll.UUCP> <1041@spice.cs.cmu.edu>
Sender: 
Reply-To: jjacobs@well.UUCP (Jeffrey Jacobs)
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: Whole Earth Lectronic Link, Sausalito CA
Keywords: Lisp, 3-Lisp, purity, reflection


As this discussion takes another turn toward the bizarre, Rob MacLachlan
states in <1041@spice.cs.cmu.edu>

>>From: jjacobs@well
>>Subject: Re: 3-Lisp
>>Date: Fri, 18-Jul-86 12:12:50 EDT
>>Reply-To: jjacobs@well.UUCP (Jeffrey Jacobs)
>>Keywords: Lisp, 3-Lisp, purity, reflection
>>
>Consider the keyword "purity" in his subject header.  He has barely begun
>his ejacluations, yet he has already revealed his latent pederasty for the
>world to see.

This is pretty funny, but  "purity" originated with Mr. Shebs, NOT ME!!!

A note on what an "ad-hominem" argument consists of: an
ad-hominem argument is a logical fallacy in which the 
[character, intelligence, sexual preferences, etc] of the speaker are
attacked rather than the content of the argument.  Examples are

"The speaker is an ignorant know-nothing, so his arguments are
worthless".

"The speaker is a communist, so his arguments are worthless".

"The speaker is a homo-sexual, so his arguments are worthless".

I really expect better of you people...

Jeffrey M. Jacobs, CONSART Systems Inc.
P.O. Box 3016, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
CIS:75076,2603
BIX:jeffjacobs
USENET: well!jjacobs
"Making symbolic programming AFFORDABLE in the free world..."