Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site yetti.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!yetti!oz
From: oz@yetti.UUCP (Ozan Yigit)
Newsgroups: net.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: 3-Lisp (or the blubbers of a closet psychologist...)
Message-ID: <395@yetti.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 28-Jul-86 18:09:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: yetti.395
Posted: Mon Jul 28 18:09:08 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 28-Jul-86 19:22:08 EDT
References: <137@utah-orion.UUCP> <1405@well.UUCP> <1000@kuling.UUCP> <1450@well.UUCP> <1041@spice.cs.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: oz@yetti.UUCP (Ozan Yigit)
Organization: York University Computer Science
Lines: 40
Keywords: Lisp, 3-Lisp, purity, reflection

Keywords: Lisp, 3-Lisp, purity, reflection
Summary: 

In article <1041@spice.cs.cmu.edu> ram@spice.cs.cmu.edu (Rob MacLachlan) writes:
>
>As is usually the case with borderline psychotics, he assumes that anyone
>who disagreees with him has misunderstood him.  Unfortunately for him, we
>understand him all too well.
>
	DO you ?? If you get your nose off that highschool psych text,
	maybe you can *really* understand.
>
>He loses touch with reality, forgetting that we are discussing a practical
>programming language rather than some misguided attempt to make a
>philosophically pure language.
>
	Practical programming language ?? What would a psych minor
	know about that ??

>...Cleanliess thus becomes
>an obsession in their diseased minds.
>
	Diseased minds ?? No psychologist worth his/her salt would use
	the term so losely. Perhaps you should check your highschool
	text once again...
>
>Rest assured that no serious language designer will take you seriously.
>
	Speculation. I speculate that he will be taken more seriously
	than you.
>
>Programmer, Spice Lisp project:
>
	Gasp !!!!!!!!

oz
-- 
The best way to have a 		Usenet: [decvax|ihnp4]!utzoo!yetti!oz
good idea is to have a 		Bitnet: oz@[yusol|yuyetti].BITNET
lot of ideas.			Phonet: [416] 736-5053 x 3976