Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!clyde!watmath!watnot!watmum!gvcormack
From: gvcormack@watmum.UUCP (Gordon V. Cormack)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c,net.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: Interactive I/O in Pascal
Message-ID: <563@watmum.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 2-Aug-86 07:22:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: watmum.563
Posted: Sat Aug  2 07:22:20 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Aug-86 23:38:47 EDT
References: <2222@brl-smoke.ARPA> <7014@boring.mcvax.UUCP>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 27
Xref: mnetor net.lang.c:5540 net.lang.pascal:359

> 
> Am I missing something?
> 
> Is there some characteristic of the Pascal language that prevents
> construction of a Pascal standard I/O package that *would* be as powerful
> as that of C?  Perhaps the existence of this characteristic is implicit in
> this discussion and that is what I am missing.  

There are lots of reasons one can't write printf in Pascal, and they
all contribute to the conclusion that Pascal is garbage.  Just
for starters, you can't (in Wirth's Pascal, anyway) even write
a procedure that takes a quoted string as a parameter, unless its
length is hard coded.  Next, you can't write a procedure that takes
a variable number of parameters.  Finally, you can't write a
*polymorphic* procedure that operates on many types, nor can you
even overload the name "printf" to make it apply to many types.

I wouldn't want anyone to take this article as support for C.
For a long time I have been suppressing the urge to post an article
to the effect:

   STOP!!  You're both wrong.
-- 
Gordon V. Cormack      CS Department, University of Waterloo
uucp:  { allegra, decvax, ... }!watmath!gvcormack
csnet: gvcormack%watmum@waterloo
cdn:   gvcormack@mum.waterloo.cdn