Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!tektronix!reed!kamath
From: kamath@reed.UUCP (Sean Kamath)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Warning! USRobuttocks Courier 2400 considered harmful!
Message-ID: <3934@reed.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 30-Jul-86 22:58:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: reed.3934
Posted: Wed Jul 30 22:58:48 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Aug-86 03:18:24 EDT
References: <2558@brl-smoke.ARPA> <3495@amdahl.UUCP> <621@ihlpf.UUCP>
Reply-To: kamath@reed.UUCP (Sean Kamath)
Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon
Lines: 29

In article <621@ihlpf.UUCP> lyourk@ihlpf.UUCP (Loran N. Yourk) writes:
>
>I have had my Courier 2400 for 5 months; of those, it worked for one
>month.  I had to send it in THREE times allready (just got it back
>yesterday).  They said, when a modem is sent in three times they replace
>the guts of them.  Each time, I wrote a more heated letter and nobody had
>any response for them.
>
>--
>Loran N. Yourk                     ihnp4!ihlpf!lyourk
>> [ The article above is not an official statement from any organization
>>   in the known universe. ]

I have (had) a Novation 212 Apple-Cat that went back three times...I'm
still waiting for it.  I wonder, is it standard practice to replace
modems after they've ben sent back three time?  Novation said they'd
send me a new one this time, but it's taken twice as long as when they
just "fixed" it.  I wonder if this has anything to do with the rumors
about Novation being sued by ATT...

________________________________________________________________________________

Sean Kamath

UUCP {ihnp4,decvax,ucbcad,hplabs}!tektronix!reed!kamath

US Snail:  Box 395 Reed College,
           Portland, OR  97202
           (503) 239-7458